February 04, 2013
RepRisk Names Ten Most Controversial Companies in 2012
by Robert Kropp
This year, the annual list from the Swiss-based environmental and social data provider focuses on
poor labor conditions and human rights violations as well as bribery, fraud and money laundering.
Last week, SocialFunds.com reported on the publication of the Global 100 list of the most sustainable corporations by Corporate Knights, the Canadian media and
research company. One could question, as I did, the inclusion on the list of a company like
Enbridge, a pipeline operator whose plans to transport crude oil from the environmentally
destructive tar sands of Alberta, Canada, have been met with significant public opposition. But the
methodology employed by Corporate Knights suggests that sustainable investors are more likely to
have their long-term approach rewarded by most of the Global 100 companies.
the companies earning the dubious distinction of inclusion on another list of top companies
published last week. RepRisk, a Swiss-based
environmental and social data provider, released its annual The Most Controversial
Companies. "Notably," the report states, "poor labor conditions and human rights violations as
well as bribery, fraud and money laundering, were the main issues criticized."
Two of the
top three companies on the list were named for specific workplace incidents. In Bangladesh, a
factory owned by garment manufacturer Tazreen Fashions caught fire and 112 workers were killed.
Survivors reported that exit doors were locked and bystanders reported that workers were forced to
jump from the windows of an eight-story building to escape. News reports compiled by RepRisk linked
Tazreen with such major corporations as Wal-Mart, Disney, Sears, Enyce, Teddy Smith, and Edinburgh
During a worker strike over wages at a platinum mine in South Africa owned
by British mining company Lonmin, clashes between miners and police led to the deaths of 34
protestors. Another 78 were injured and 259 were arrested. South African President Jacob Zuma
announced a Judicial Commission of Inquiry into the tragedy.
Finishing second on RepRisk's
list was Olympus. The Japanese company engaged in accounting fraud that allowed it to conceal $1.7
billion in investment losses from investors and auditors. Olympus was also criticized for using
conflict minerals in its products and for poor working conditions at the factory of a supplier in
Tied for fourth place was News Corp, due largely to continuing fallout from the
phone hacking scandal but also for the sourcing by a subsidiary of paper from endangered Indonesian
forests. Also ranking fourth was Samsung, for poor working conditions at its supplier factories and
Lonmin and Samsung are also included on a recently published
list from GMI Ratings of companies "that
have been involved in workplace safety violations and/or have utilized sweat shop labor in their
Such companies, GMI reports, "may be more likely to be fined or to suffer
reputational damage; poor oversight of such labor matters may also be an indicator of management
quality more broadly. As a result, many investors are examining the workplace safety record of the
companies whose securities they hold, and are favoring firms that have avoided substantial
Included on GMI's watch list was Wal-Mart, for workplace safety events.
Despite the widespread attention by news outlets to allegations of bribery by the retailer's
Mexican subsidiary, Wal-Mart was not included on RepRisk's 2012 list.
Also included on
GMI's list is a number of information and communications technology (ICT) companiesóDell, Ericsson,
Hewlett-Packard, and Microsoft, along with Samsungófor supply chain issues.