where checking accounts rebuild communities
Back to homepageInstitutional ReportsSRI Financial Professionals DirectoryToolsNewsSRI Performance and TrendsAbout Us   

April 16, 2004
Thirteen Pension Funds Call on SEC to Require Disclosure on Climate Change Risk
    by William Baue

Institutional investors ask the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue a clarification that climate change is a material risk which must be disclosed in filings.

First question: is climate change reasonably likely to occur? (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the official international body charged with reviewing the scientific evidence on climate change, certainly thinks so.) Second question: is it reasonably likely to have a material effect on companies' liquidity, capital resources, or results of operations? Such is the two-pronged test to determine if certain risks require disclosure under Item 303 of US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-K, or Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A).

A group of 13 public pension funds managing over $800 billion in assets believes that many companies are not fulfilling their duty to disclose the material financial risks associated with climate change in their MD&As. The group is sending a letter to SEC Chair William Donaldson asking him to clarify that climate change is indeed a material risk requiring disclosure on security filings. Yesterday, at the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (CERES) Annual Conference, the group made public its plea.

"As you know, the existing regulatory framework requires companies to disclose material risks, including environmental risks, that may diminish shareholder value," the letter to Mr. Donaldson reads. "The need to incorporate climate risk into standard corporate disclosure practices grows increasingly urgent, as recent evidence suggests that in certain sectors the cost of climate change to shareholder value can represent as much as 15 percent of the total market capitalization of major companies."

"Therefore, investors would like to see the SEC issue clarification on disclosure of climate risk information," continued the letter sent by members of the group, which consists of eight state treasurers and comptrollers, four labor fund leaders, and the New York City comptroller. Ten of the group members belong to the Investor Network for Climate Risk (INCR), which formed in the wake of the Institutional Investor Summit on Climate Risk that took place at the United Nations headquarters in New York City in November 2003.

The SEC routinely issues clarification notices when rules with wide latitude for interpretation need to be reigned in and more clearly defined.

"We are calling upon SEC Chairman William Donaldson to eliminate any doubt that publicly traded companies should be disclosing the financial risks of global warming in their security filings," said Mindy Lubber, executive director of CERES. "It is our opinion that that is already required--it is also our opinion it that is not happening."

A recent CERES report on 20 companies with significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions finds that eight made no mention of climate change in their 2001 10-K or 20-F filings. Therefore these companies either believe that climate change is not reasonably likely to occur, which seems an untenable position, or they believe that climate change does not pose a material financial risk to them. This position, too, seems untenable for oil companies such as ChevronTexaco (ticker: CVX) or ExxonMobil (XOM), as the burning of fossil fuels emits significant amounts of carbon dioxide, the primary GHG linked to climate change.

Connecticut State Treasurer Denise Nappier cites the counter example of American Electric Power (AEP), which recently met the terms of a shareowner resolution asking for a report on the potential impacts of climate change and plans to mitigate these risks.

"When you have American Electric Power and other companies recognizing their fiduciary duty to assess and disclose their environmental risk exposure to shareholders, then we have to ask: shouldn't the SEC also be recognizing this responsibility?" she asked. "Shareholders should not have to struggle company-by-company to get the level of analysis and disclosure we need."

Maine State Treasurer Dale McCormick points out that MD&A rules do not stop at disclosure, but also require companies to provide in-depth analysis of the risks.

"Companies with high emissions are even telling us those emissions are going to cost them--but that's about all they say," said Ms. McCormick. "If we don't make this standard operating procedure, then you don't get the analysis going and you don't get information that is very useful--either for company management or for the investors--and most importantly, you don't get the change that protects the value of retirement funds."


| Reports | SRI Financial Professionals Directory | Tools | News | SRI Performance and Trends | About Us | Contact
© SRI World Group, Inc. - All rights reserved
Terms of use - Privacy Policy - OneReportTM Network