where checking accounts rebuild communities
Back to homepageInstitutional ReportsSRI Financial Professionals DirectoryToolsNewsSRI Performance and TrendsAbout Us   

June 18, 2003
Investors Managing $3 Trillion Back Blair's Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
    by William Baue

Developing countries are being prodded to support oil and mining companies disclosure of payments the companies make to governments.

Yesterday, British Prime Minister Tony Blair unveiled the Statement of Principles and Actions for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), which encourages oil and mining companies to disclose the payments they make to the governments of countries where they operate. Currently, host governments usually require extractive companies to conceal payments of taxes, royalties, and signature bonuses. This practice often masks corruption and the siphoning of these funds from public coffers. A coalition of 36 international institutional investors who manage almost $3 trillion in assets issued a statement in support of EITI.

"This unprecedented support from the investment community demonstrates that good governance and transparency serve the interests of the business community wherever it operates," Mr. Blair stated. "Better openness and accountability are essential to securing the stability and prosperity that the developing world needs, and on which our mutual business success depends."

EITI, which Mr. Blair launched at the World Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa in September 2002, points out "a close correlation between the countries rich in natural resources" and those plagued with "high levels of poverty." Billionaire philanthropist George Soros, who backs the Publish What You Pay (PWYP) initiative upon which EITI is based, calls this ironic phenomenon the "resource curse." PWYP, which was established in December 1999 by Global Witness and now includes more than 120 other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), encourages stock exchanges to require listed companies to disclose payments to governments where they extract resources.

"Publish What You Pay got the issue in front of Tony Blair, and shocked everybody into action," said Karina Litvack, director of governance and socially responsible investment (SRI) at ISIS Asset Management. ISIS coordinated the investors' statement, which was also signed by the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), Canada-based Ethical Funds, South Africa-based Frater Asset Management, and UK-based University Superannuation Scheme.

However, EITI differs from Publish What You Pay by focusing not on listed companies, which own less than 20 percent of the world's oil reserves, but on the host governments. This strategy avoids putting listed companies at a competitive disadvantage to private companies, as well as a related dynamic, which Ms. Litvack refers to as the "first-mover disadvantage." For example, BP (ticker: BP) decided to reveal its $100 million signature bonus to Angola, a move that compromised future business dealings with the country. BP hoped its competitors would follow suit, but none did.

Ms. Litvack said: "Frankly, every company we spoke with said, 'give us a law that forces us and our competitors to disclose, and we will be delighted to do so, but don't ask us to do something the local law doesn't tell us to do, especially since the contracts we sign with these governments forbid us from disclosing this information. You've got to persuade these governments to remove the confidentiality clauses and force everyone to disclose.'"

EITI seeks to do exactly that, though it is a matter of some sensitivity for developed countries such as the UK and US to tell sovereign governments how to function.

"Some people have called it pseudo-Imperialism, the fact that all these rich-country governments are getting together and telling these developing countries, 'you really ought to change your laws,'" Ms. Litvack said. "This is always the dilemma in the international political process: where do you draw the line between sovereignty and fundamental human rights?"

Although resource-rich developing nations have yet to sign onto EITI, eleven such countries have reportedly agreed to continue discussion over adopting the initiative's principles. These countries include Azerbaijan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, East Timor, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, and Trinidad and Tobago.

That these countries would agree to consider the "first world" dictations may be influenced by the reliance on continued investment by global corporations, which ultimately must answer to their stockowners. The investor statement thus played a key role in supporting this stage of EITI's development.

"What amazed me is that organizations that have no history of activism in governance issues, much less SRI issues, were signing our investor statement," said Ms. Litvack. Fidelity Investments and Merrill Lynch Investment Managers signed the statement. "They saw this as a bottom line issue, something that couldn't hurt and could only help."


| Reports | SRI Financial Professionals Directory | Tools | News | SRI Performance and Trends | About Us | Contact
© SRI World Group, Inc. - All rights reserved
Terms of use - Privacy Policy - OneReportTM Network